On DNA

As one of the biggest fan in CSI, I was baffled when the police would like to take DNA samples from the blood of the “dead” Nurin Jazlin's parents and siblings. There were much simpler ways of taking DNA samples, which are from

1. finger nails
2. cells from inside your cheek
3. hair
4. taik idung
5. taik telinga

To name a few lah kan. I mean, as long as it was the cells from you + your other half + the dead. You can easily determine DNA profile by that simpler and normal stuff. Haruskeee kena amik darah yg lebih sakit n gory itu berulang2 kali?

And also, budak tu tak pernah ke guna thumbprint ke apa ke?

I humbly propose to the parents & the police & the powers that be to watch CSI from now. It teaches you the Objective of Science (well yeah in a way, CSI is in a utopia state ler kan, bukan realiti). I wonder why I cannot use Science to solve my love problems? Or issit that I choose NOT TO use it?

I hate my own ignorance. Bah!

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

p/s: This is not the first time they took ONLY blood samples (from the news we read). Its just a sampling case out of the many. My point is, why take only 1 DNA source = BLOOD when you can get loads of it from other sources as well. Then, when someone query about the non-confidence, you go and take the sampling AGAIN (using BLOOD [again!!]). Kan dah boleh buat multi test on the first blood sample, that is why you MUST take more than 1 kinda sampling. Hey! Its audit thingy what. I know the "audit" way. As if macam you let people to think that you are not capable to do things and as if the police make one big mistake. So why not close that "gap" by taking multi sources of DNA - not just blood. Faham?

I mean, why must you give people to question your way of sampling and non-confidence? Just take multi sources of DNA laaa...tak payah nak amek 2-3 kali...Kan ke mcm "blunder" to your own "face"? As i said, CSI is in utopia or ideal state. You can watch Crime and Investigation Network over Astro to understand more of the CSI real deal.